Rethinking dosimeter assignment for military radiation safety

Focusing on comparative performance of thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs) and electronic personal dosimeters (EPDs) under portable x-ray exposure

Authors

  • Hosub Chi ROK CBRN Defense Research Institute
  • Jungmi Park ROK CBRN Defense Research Institute
  • Gyoungjun Choi ROK CBRN Defense Research Institute
  • Kang Ku ROK CBRN Defense Research Institute

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37944/jams.v8i1.273

Keywords:

personal dosimeter, thermoluminescent dosimeter (TLD), electronic personal dosimeter (EPD), military radiation safety, portable X-ray generators

Abstract

The increasing use of portable X-ray generators in military operations—particularly for explosive detection and counter-terrorism—has highlighted the need for a radiation safety strategy tailored to field-based, low-dose environments. This study evaluates the performance of thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs) and electronic personal dosimeters (EPDs) under controlled pulsed X-ray conditions using the XRS-3 generator, focusing on their sensitivity, dose-response characteristics, and operational suitability in military contexts. The results showed that while TLDs exhibited high accuracy in cumulative dose tracking, they failed to detect radiation beyond 3 meters or at low pulse counts. In contrast, EPDs—although they showed some inconsistencies in cumulative dose measurements under low-dose conditions—successfully detected radiation at all distances and pulse settings. Their ability to provide immediate feedback and detect fluctuations in real time makes them more suitable for dynamic radiation monitoring in military field environments. The study provides a solid foundation for revising current military dosimetry protocols in current military radiation safety management practices.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biographies

Hosub Chi, ROK CBRN Defense Research Institute

* (First author) ROK CBRN Defense Research Institute, Senior Research Officer for Radiological Analysis, [email protected], https://orcid.org/0009-0002-3918-4567

Jungmi Park, ROK CBRN Defense Research Institute

 ** (Co-author) ROK CBRN Defense Research Institute, Radiation Safety Researcher, [email protected], https://orcid.org/0009-0005-4247-732X.

Gyoungjun Choi, ROK CBRN Defense Research Institute

*** (Co-author) ROK CBRN Defense Research Institute, Radiation Safety Officer, [email protected], https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5243-1780.

Kang Ku, ROK CBRN Defense Research Institute

**** (Corresponding author) ROK CBRN Defense Research Institute, Head of Radiological Analysis Department, [email protected], https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8739–218X.

Chief of Radiological Analysis Branch, Radiological Analysis Branch

Ph.D. in Materials Engineering (KAIST)

References

Aswal, D. K., & Chandra, A. (2024). Ionizing Radiation Measurements. In Handbook on Radiation Environment, Volume 2: Dose Measurements (pp. 1-17). Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-2799-5_1

Bolognese-Milsztajn, T., Ginjaume, M., Luszik-Bhadra, M., Vanhavere, F., Wahl, W., & Weeks, A. (2004). Active personal dosimeters for individual monitoring and other new developments. Radiation Protection Dosimetry, 112(1), 141–168. https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/nch286

Golden Engineering. (2018). Golden Engineering XRS3 User Manual. https://www.manualslib.com/manual/2423335/Golden-Engineering-Xrs3.html?page=16

Henderson, D., Mark, S., Rawlings, D., & Robson, K. (2022). Portable X-rays–A new era?IPEM-Translation, 3–4, 100005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipemt.2022.100005

Hou, B., Chen, Q., Yi, L., Sellin, P., Sun, H. T., Wong, L. J., & Liu, X. (2024). Materials innovation and electrical engineering in X-ray detection. Nature Reviews Electrical Engineering, 1(10), 639-655. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44287-024-00086-x

ICRP. (1997). General Principles for the Radiation Protection of Workers. ICRP Publication 75. Ann. ICRP 27(1). https://www.icrp.org/publication.asp?id=ICRP%20Publication%2075

Ipe, N. E. (2021). Area and individual radiation monitoring, In Darafsheh, A. (Ed.), Radiation Therapy Dosimetry: A Practical Handbook (1st ed.), 185–210. CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781351005388

Korea Foundation for Nuclear Safety. (2022). 2021 Radiation and Nuclear Safety Status Survey.

Korea Foundation for Nuclear Safety. (2023). 2022 Radiation and Nuclear Safety Status Survey.

Korea Foundation for Nuclear Safety. (2024). 2023 Radiation and Nuclear Safety Status Survey.

Korea Foundation of Nuclear Safety. (2013). Basic education manual for radiation workers – General field (new trainees). Republic of Korea.

Kry, S.F., Alvarez, P., Cygler, J.E., DeWerd, L.A., Howell, R.M., Meeks, S., O’Daniel, J., Reft, C., Sawakuchi, G., Yukihara, E.G. & Mihailidis, D. (2020), AAPM TG 191: Clinical use of luminescent dosimet ers: TLDs and OSLDs. Medical Physics. 47(2), e19-e51. https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.13839

Lee, B., Kim, T., & Lim, Y. (2015). Performance analysis of electronic personal dosimeters (EPDs) for external radiation exposure assessment. Journal of Radiation Protection and Research, 40(4), 261–266. https://doi.org/10.14407/jrp.2015.40.4.261

Luszik-Bhadra, M. (2007). Electronic personal neutron dosemeters for high energies: measurements, new developments and further needs. Radiation protection dosimetry, 126(1-4), 487-490. https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncm098

McCaffrey, J. P., Shen, H., & Downton, B. (2008). Dose rate dependency of electronic personal dosemeters measuring X- and γ-ray radiation. Radiation Protection Dosimetry, 131(2), 229–235. https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncn133

Moon, S., Yoon, M., Kim, SY. & Shin, D. (2021). A new real-time personal dosimeter with position monitoring based on a scintillator. Journal of the Korean Physical Society. 78. 1133–1140. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40042-021-00075-5

Nuclear Safety and Security Commission. (2019). Investigation results and countermeasures for the radiation exposure accident of subcontracted workers at Seoul Semiconductor Co., Ltd. Republic of Korea. Retrieved from https://www.nssc.go.kr/ajaxfile/FR_SVC/FileDown.do?GBN=X01&BOARD_SEQ=14&SITE_NO=2&BBS_SEQ=45893&FILE_SEQ=2

Nuclear Safety and Security Commission. (2024). Investigation results and action plan for the radiation exposure incident at Samsung Electronics Giheung Plant. Republic of Korea. Retrieved from https://www.nssc.go.kr/attach/namo/files/000002/20240926174645693_1E891JFD.pdf

Oliveira, A. M. (2017). Optimization of an invivo verification system using tld dosimetry-metrological validation using the iso 28057: 2014 standard. [Mestrado, Universidade do Porto]https://repositorio-aberto.up.pt/bitstream/10216/110696/2/250425.pdf

Shinde, A., Mali, S. G., & Thekkuttu, S. (2022, December). Design of X-ray Generator Simulator. In 2022 International Conference on Recent Trends in Microelectronics, Automation, Computing and Communications Systems (ICMACC) (pp. 325-330). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICMACC54824.2022.10093314

Towers, L. (2024). The design and testing of a one megaampere pulsed power system. [Master of Science, University of Alabama in Huntsville] https://louis.uah.edu/uah-theses/670

Yadav, R.K.B., Chandra, A., Meena, T., Divkar, J. K. Vikas, Mishra, A., Pujari, R. N., Narsaiah, M.V.R. & Prabath, R. (2024). Radiation Emergency Preparedness and Response. In: Aswal, D.K. (eds) Handbook on Radiation Environment, Volume 1. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-2795-7_18

XRS-3 portable X-ray generator

Downloads

Published

2025-05-16

How to Cite

Chi, H., Park, J., Choi, G., & Ku, K. (2025). Rethinking dosimeter assignment for military radiation safety: Focusing on comparative performance of thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs) and electronic personal dosimeters (EPDs) under portable x-ray exposure. Journal of Advances in Military Studies, 8(1), 37-56. https://doi.org/10.37944/jams.v8i1.273